Hello,
On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 04:01:12PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
@@ -235,7 +235,6 @@ machine-$(CONFIG_PLAT_SPEAR) += spear # by CONFIG_* macro name. plat-$(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP) += omap plat-$(CONFIG_ARCH_S3C64XX) += samsung -plat-$(CONFIG_ARCH_S5PV210) += samsung
Would it make more sense to make this
plat-$(PLAT_SAMSUNG) += samsung(in a separate patch)? Hmm, it seems there is no plat-y for PLAT_S3C24XX=y builds. Is this intended? If yes, the directory name containing "samsung" suggests something that seems untrue.
By the end of the series, the plat-samsung directory is completely removed (folded into mach-s3c), so that would only add more churn for the same result I think.
fine for me. The background of my question was me wondering if builds for PLAT_S3C24XX=y (before your patch series) don't need plat-samsung.
Best regards Uwe