On 19/06/11 13:49, Mark Brown wrote:
Previously we were using the DAPM context rather than a widget as the argument for update_bits() so we didn't need to care that our list walk of widgets left us one beyond the end of the list. Now we're using them for the register update we need to make sure we're pointing at an actual widget not the list_head.
Fix originally suggested by Liam on IM.
Thanks, was planning to send this yesterday but ended up being delayed at several airports yesterday.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com
sound/soc/soc-dapm.c | 6 ++++++ 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c b/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c index 605c225..ceb2ba4 100644 --- a/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c +++ b/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c @@ -918,6 +918,12 @@ static void dapm_seq_run_coalesced(struct snd_soc_dapm_context *dapm, }
if (reg >= 0) {
/* Any widget will do, they should all be updating the* same register.*/w = list_first_entry(pending, struct snd_soc_dapm_widget,power_list);- pop_dbg(dapm->dev, card->pop_time, "pop test : Applying 0x%x/0x%x to %x in %dms\n", value, mask, reg, card->pop_time);
Acked-by: Liam Girdwood lrg@ti.com