4 Sep
2017
4 Sep
'17
2:18 p.m.
On Mon, Sep 04, 2017 at 12:03:21PM +0200, Arnaud Pouliquen wrote:
+static const struct snd_soc_dai_ops dmic_dai_ops = {
- .trigger = dmic_daiops_trigger,
+};
should it be handle by trigger or DAPM?
DAPM is a bit better, yes. I don't think it matters *overly* much in this case where there's nothing else going on with the device, though bypass use cases would need it. OTOH it could mess up the timing. I was on the edge with this one but I decided that if it ends up making a problem the binding is fine and the code can be sorted later.