13 Sep
2012
13 Sep
'12
2:08 p.m.
On Wed, 2012-09-12 at 10:57 +0800, Mark Brown wrote:
- aif_ctrl |= (DA9055_AIF_OE | DA9055_AIF_EN);
DAPM.
Here the trouble in making it DAPM based is that there is no separate control for AIF input and output. It is confirmed that AIF_EN is the master control bit, which enables both output as well as input. The AIF _OE bit is redundant. If we use the same control bit(i.e AIF_EN) for both DAPM_AIF_IN and DAPM_AIF_OUT, there will be obvious side effects. Is there any other way to take care of this? Or should we leave it outside DAPM?