2 Mar
2018
2 Mar
'18
11:50 a.m.
On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 10:47:08PM +0100, Ladislav Michl wrote:
On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 06:22:02PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
flexible. Devices don't need to be able to do this independently, you can have a flexible external clock tree for example.
Thanks for clarifying this. So in this particular case we should use snd_pcm_hw_constraint_list for SNDRV_PCM_HW_PARAM_RATE to enforce only supported rates based on master clock, right? I'll rework this patch then.
Yes, that's the ideal.