On Tue, 01 Dec 2015 22:48:41 +0100, Subhransu S. Prusty wrote:
On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 01:57:01PM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
On Tue, 01 Dec 2015 18:47:11 +0100, Subhransu S. Prusty wrote:
From: Ramesh Babu ramesh.babu@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ramesh Babu ramesh.babu@intel.com Signed-off-by: Subhransu S. Prusty subhransu.s.prusty@intel.com Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul vinod.koul@intel.com
sound/soc/codecs/hdac_hdmi.c | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/hdac_hdmi.c b/sound/soc/codecs/hdac_hdmi.c index 46aa5cc..fa3cfa5 100644 --- a/sound/soc/codecs/hdac_hdmi.c +++ b/sound/soc/codecs/hdac_hdmi.c @@ -1136,6 +1136,14 @@ static int hdac_hdmi_dev_probe(struct hdac_ext_device *edev) INIT_LIST_HEAD(&hdmi_priv->pin_list); INIT_LIST_HEAD(&hdmi_priv->cvt_list);
- ret = snd_hdac_display_power(edev->hdac.bus, true);
- if (ret < 0) {
dev_err(&edev->hdac.dev,"Cannot turn on display power on i915 err: %d\n",ret);return ret;- }
- ret = hdac_hdmi_parse_and_map_nid(edev, &hdmi_dais, &num_dais); if (ret < 0) { dev_err(&codec->dev, "Failed in parse and map nid with err: %d\n", ret);
-- 1.9.1
No counterpart to turn off?
turned off in runtime suspend during first explicit suspend call.
It's a refcount, hence it does matter how many times it's called. Does it really balance well? It smells suspicious if you add only a call to turn on without turning off...
Takashi