8 Mar
2012
8 Mar
'12
3:10 p.m.
On 03/08/2012 01:52 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Mark Brown broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com wrote:
/* dapm control */
short reg; /* negative reg = no direct dapm */
unsigned int reg; /* negative reg = no direct dapm */
Maybe you should update the comment now that this is unsigned int.
There are also a few places in soc-dapm.c which check for reg >= 0 to handle SND_SOC_NOPM, those need to be updated as well.