On 01/31/2012 04:40 PM, Takashi Iwai wrote:
At Tue, 31 Jan 2012 16:28:14 +0100, David Henningsson wrote:
On 01/31/2012 03:17 PM, Takashi Iwai wrote:
At Tue, 31 Jan 2012 09:04:15 +0100, David Henningsson wrote:
If a codec has both a front and a rear Line In, two controls both named "Line Jack" will be created, which causes parsing to fail. While a long term solution might be to name the jacks differently, this extra check is consistent with what is already being done in many auto-parsers, and will also protect against other cases when two inputs have the same label.
BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/923409 Signed-off-by: David Henningssondavid.henningsson@canonical.com
Thanks, applied now.
BTW, any chance to change apport to gather alsa-info.sh output?
This has now been provided: http://www.alsa-project.org/db/?f=f4a8312f34573a24f60011109e18f0c7371129e0
It'd be a great help, so that we can check it via hda-emu.
I have asked for this particular bug reporter to supply alsa-info as well, but may I ask you...do you have some kind of regression test script, and if so, are they public? Or could it a part of hda-emu?
The checks I often do are scripts like below. Run for all files and check the difference before and after the patch.
It would be nice if you could run "make tests" or something from the hda-emu source directory, and it would parse all codecs and report error if parsing fails (or pm fails, etc).
Yeah, any patch is welcome ;)
Thanks for the small test scripts! It's good to be on the same page. Hopefully I get around some day to write a "make tests", but not right now unfortunately.
I quickly ran test2 and noticed that - We have quite a lot of work to do before all errors are fixed! - The error I got from hda-emu for the codec above, 'Control element Line Jack:0 already exists!' was already present for one of the codecs.