3 Jan
2008
3 Jan
'08
7:20 p.m.
Grant Likely wrote:
The device tree is a description of the hardware; not software. It's not a good idea to break with convention due to current driver architecture.
I believe that with ASoC V1, I'm stuck between a rock and a hard place, and so the only way to make this code work is to bend some rules. Right now, the CS4270 driver does not support platform drivers or the device tree, so there's no point in putting a child I2C node for it. As I mentioned in other posts, I will be more than happy to update the CS4270 driver to support this new paradigm (which was invented after the CS4270 driver was written) *after* this current patchset is applied.
--
Timur Tabi
Linux Kernel Developer @ Freescale