20 Mar
2012
20 Mar
'12
6:04 p.m.
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 06:15:34PM +0200, Grazvydas Ignotas wrote:
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 6:01 PM, Mark Brown
though this should probably have the note about working around broken applications from the cover letter in the changelog as with the changelog alone it's really not apparent why we're doing this here as a driver specific thing.
I wouldn't really call them broken, it's enough to set period size to 512 with smaller start_threshold (something like 50ms) to have problems, those parameters are perfectly valid for a program trying to achieve low latency.
If they can't cope with the parameters they've set I'd call them broken, they should've asked for more sensible parameters.