14 Feb
2018
14 Feb
'18
5:49 p.m.
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 2:41 PM, Richard Fitzgerald rf@opensource.cirrus.com wrote:
This is the actual problem you are trying to fix? The comment about { 0 } only clearing the first member is probably bogus, your actual problem is that it should have been { NULL } ?
Changing to { NULL } fixes the sparse warning, but that would be a fragile fix because it relies on the order of the struct members.
If someday the struct changes in a way so that the first member is no longer a pointer, then we will have issues again.
Using {} is more error prone.