On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 4:19 PM, Mark Brown broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com wrote:
Well, that's rather different to what your patch did - I'd expect your patch would also be avoiding setting up all the not connected stuff on Panda. Perhaps what's needed is platform data (which can have a DT representation when that comes) which represents the differences and can include the name to use?
Ultimately this is the plan, but for 3.2 it would have been too big of a change. I just happen to had the DMIC support done locally first (will send it soon). Just reordered the patches, since we feel that 3.2 kernel would deserve fix for the Panda audio, and obviously the DMIC will go for 3.3. The DT representation will follow as soon as I can work out some of the issues with it.