Hi Mark Brown,
The codec driver is present in mainline as rt5631.c., Its realtek's alc5631 so retained that name. Similarly machine driver also is named as arndale_rt5631.c but inside that driver I have used alc5631 naming as the audio daughter card on arndale board mentions alc5631 so I have used this convention here so that user should not feel the absence of the driver.
Is that ok or do you want to have one naming all over?
-Krishna
-------------------------------------------------- From: "Mark Brown" broonie@kernel.org Sent: Monday, November 10, 2014 7:07 PM To: "Krishna Mohan Dani" krishna.md@samsung.com Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; alsa-devel@alsa-project.org; kgene.kim@samsung.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] ASoC: ALC5631: Add device tree binding documentation
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 01:31:56PM +0530, Krishna Mohan Dani wrote:
Document the device tree binding for the ALC5631 codec and update vendor specific prefix for the Realtek.
This driver isn't in mainline, you need to submit the driver.