I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code, thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.
Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu chuansheng.liu@intel.com Signed-off-by: Baole Ni baolex.ni@intel.com --- sound/pci/cs46xx/cs46xx.c | 12 ++++++------ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/pci/cs46xx/cs46xx.c b/sound/pci/cs46xx/cs46xx.c index 655fbea..928d768 100644 --- a/sound/pci/cs46xx/cs46xx.c +++ b/sound/pci/cs46xx/cs46xx.c @@ -51,17 +51,17 @@ static bool external_amp[SNDRV_CARDS]; static bool thinkpad[SNDRV_CARDS]; static bool mmap_valid[SNDRV_CARDS] = {[0 ... (SNDRV_CARDS - 1)] = 1};
-module_param_array(index, int, NULL, 0444); +module_param_array(index, int, NULL, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); MODULE_PARM_DESC(index, "Index value for the CS46xx soundcard."); -module_param_array(id, charp, NULL, 0444); +module_param_array(id, charp, NULL, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); MODULE_PARM_DESC(id, "ID string for the CS46xx soundcard."); -module_param_array(enable, bool, NULL, 0444); +module_param_array(enable, bool, NULL, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); MODULE_PARM_DESC(enable, "Enable CS46xx soundcard."); -module_param_array(external_amp, bool, NULL, 0444); +module_param_array(external_amp, bool, NULL, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); MODULE_PARM_DESC(external_amp, "Force to enable external amplifer."); -module_param_array(thinkpad, bool, NULL, 0444); +module_param_array(thinkpad, bool, NULL, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); MODULE_PARM_DESC(thinkpad, "Force to enable Thinkpad's CLKRUN control."); -module_param_array(mmap_valid, bool, NULL, 0444); +module_param_array(mmap_valid, bool, NULL, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); MODULE_PARM_DESC(mmap_valid, "Support OSS mmap.");
static const struct pci_device_id snd_cs46xx_ids[] = {