23 May
2016
23 May
'16
11:29 p.m.
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 06:15:16PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 05:59:31PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 09:16:09PM +0200, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
How about allowing to embed eBPF bytecode in the DT that can be installed as a constraint set? This would allow maximum for flexibility and also make the implementation a lot easier.
That seems somewhat Linux specific, I'd like to see some DT maintainer buy in on that one as well as Takashi's thoughts.
I am very much not in favour of embedding eBPF bytecode into the DT.
+1 What's wrong with Forth? ;)
Rob