On 05/10/2022 13:29, Takashi Iwai wrote:
...
HDA playback is failing on -next for various Tegra boards. Bisect is point to this commit and reverting it fixes the problem. I was a bit puzzled why this change is causing a problem, but looking closer there is a difference between the previous code that was calling snd_hdac_stream_readb() and the new code that is calling snd_hdac_stream_readb_poll(). The function snd_hdac_stream_readb() calls snd_hdac_aligned_mmio() is see if the device has an aligned MMIO which Tegra does and then would call snd_hdac_aligned_read(). However, now the code always call readb() and this is breaking Tegra.
So it is either necessary to update snd_hdac_stream_readb_poll() to handle this or revert this change.
Does the patch below work?
thanks,
Takashi
-- 8< -- --- a/include/sound/hdaudio.h +++ b/include/sound/hdaudio.h @@ -592,8 +592,8 @@ int snd_hdac_get_stream_stripe_ctl(struct hdac_bus *bus, #define snd_hdac_stream_readb(dev, reg) \ snd_hdac_reg_readb((dev)->bus, (dev)->sd_addr + AZX_REG_ ## reg) #define snd_hdac_stream_readb_poll(dev, reg, val, cond, delay_us, timeout_us) \
- readb_poll_timeout((dev)->sd_addr + AZX_REG_ ## reg, val, cond, \
delay_us, timeout_us)
- read_poll_timeout(snd_hdac_reg_readb, val, cond, delay_us, timeout_us,\
false, (dev)->bus, (dev)->sd_addr + AZX_REG_ ## reg)
So looking at this a bit more I see ...
[ 199.422773] bad: scheduling from the idle thread! [ 199.427610] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Tainted: G D C 6.0.0-rc7-next-20220930-00007-gd6ae4ed0a78f-dirty #23 [ 199.438880] Hardware name: NVIDIA Jetson Nano Developer Kit (DT) [ 199.444899] Call trace: [ 199.447357] dump_backtrace.part.7+0xe8/0xf8 [ 199.451680] show_stack+0x14/0x38 [ 199.455024] dump_stack_lvl+0x64/0x7c [ 199.458715] dump_stack+0x14/0x2c [ 199.462067] dequeue_task_idle+0x2c/0x58 [ 199.466038] dequeue_task+0x38/0x98 [ 199.469565] __schedule+0x4a4/0x6d8 [ 199.473104] schedule+0x58/0xc0 [ 199.476292] schedule_hrtimeout_range_clock+0x98/0x108 [ 199.481472] schedule_hrtimeout_range+0x10/0x18 [ 199.486039] usleep_range_state+0x7c/0xb0 [ 199.490084] snd_hdac_stream_reset+0xe8/0x328 [snd_hda_core] [ 199.495913] snd_hdac_stream_sync+0xe4/0x190 [snd_hda_core] [ 199.501627] azx_pcm_trigger+0x1d8/0x250 [snd_hda_codec] [ 199.507109] snd_pcm_do_stop+0x54/0x70 [ 199.510904] snd_pcm_action_single+0x44/0xa0 [ 199.515215] snd_pcm_drain_done+0x20/0x28 [ 199.519267] snd_pcm_update_state+0x114/0x128 [ 199.523670] snd_pcm_update_hw_ptr0+0x22c/0x3a0 [ 199.528246] snd_pcm_period_elapsed_under_stream_lock+0x44/0x88 [ 199.534216] snd_pcm_period_elapsed+0x24/0x48 [ 199.538617] stream_update+0x3c/0x50 [snd_hda_codec] [ 199.543737] snd_hdac_bus_handle_stream_irq+0xe8/0x150 [snd_hda_core] [ 199.550320] azx_interrupt+0xb4/0x1b0 [snd_hda_codec] [ 199.555524] __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x74/0x140 [ 199.560281] handle_irq_event_percpu+0x14/0x48 [ 199.564772] handle_irq_event+0x44/0x88 [ 199.568653] handle_fasteoi_irq+0xa8/0x130 [ 199.572788] generic_handle_domain_irq+0x28/0x40 [ 199.577452] gic_handle_irq+0x9c/0xb8 [ 199.581168] call_on_irq_stack+0x2c/0x40 [ 199.585129] do_interrupt_handler+0x7c/0x80 [ 199.589355] el1_interrupt+0x34/0x68 [ 199.592969] el1h_64_irq_handler+0x14/0x20 [ 199.597107] el1h_64_irq+0x64/0x68 [ 199.600540] cpuidle_enter_state+0x130/0x2f8 [ 199.604853] cpuidle_enter+0x38/0x50 [ 199.608463] call_cpuidle+0x18/0x38 [ 199.611991] do_idle+0x1f8/0x248 [ 199.615259] cpu_startup_entry+0x20/0x28 [ 199.619224] kernel_init+0x0/0x128 [ 199.622669] arch_post_acpi_subsys_init+0x0/0x8 [ 199.627240] start_kernel+0x630/0x668 [ 199.630933] __primary_switched+0xb4/0xbc
If I change your patch to be read_poll_timeout_atomic, then it works \o/
Can we make that update?
Jon