24 Oct
2018
24 Oct
'18
3:35 p.m.
On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 05:11:57PM +0000, Tc, Jenny wrote:
The driver already exposes another parameter (wakeup-delay-ms) using device tree. Enabling ACPI device enumeration provides a way to pass existing parameter and also cover the new parameter(modeswitch_delay_ms) introduced in this patch set. Isn't it good to adopt ACPI enumeration if the driver has multiple parameters to handle?
If you want to adopt device tree bindings in ACPI systems there is already the _DSD based mapping for this. However please be aware that ACPI and DT systems have radically different approaches in a number of areas, including describing sound cards, and trying to combine the two in the same system might lead to disappointment.