Hi Tomasz,
Thank you for the comments. I'll revise them in v6. And below is my reply for you comments.
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 02:18:22PM +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote:
- clock-names : Includes the following entries:
- name type comments
- "core" Required The core clock of spdif controller
- "rx" Optional Rx clock source for spdif record.
If absent, will use core clock.
- "tx" Optional Tx clock source for spdif playback.
If absent, will use core clock.
- "tx-32000" Optional Tx clock source for 32000Hz sample rate
playback. If absent, will use tx clock.
- "tx-44100" Optional Tx clock source for 44100Hz sample rate
playback. If absent, will use tx clock.
- "tx-48000" Optional Tx clock source for 48000Hz sample rate
playback. If absent, will use tx clock.
- "src<0-7>" Optional Clock source list for tx and rx clock
to look up their clock source indexes.
This clock list should be identical to
the list of TxClk_Source bit value of
register SPDIF_STC. If absent or failed
to look up, tx and rx clock would then
ignore the "rx", "tx" "tx-32000",
"tx-44100", "tx-48000" clock phandles
and select the core clock as default
tx and rx clock.
I suspect a little abuse of clocks property here. From the description of "core" and "src<0-7>" clocks I assume that the IP can have up to 9 clock inputs - core clock and up to 8 extra source clocks. Is it correct?
If yes, this makes the "tx", "rx" and "tx-*" clocks describe configuration, not hardware. IMHO it should be up to the driver which source clocks to use for tx and rx channels and for each sampling rate.
First, you are right that all the properties you just commented are software configurations. And I got the point that device tree now can't allow any software configuration even if the actual hardware connection will depend on it.
If so, I would like to remove those abused clocks and also drop the unused clocks in src<0-7>, then just remain those needed clocks src. I think that can be plausible because there'll be no more clock abuse and the driver will be able to get the source index from the name 'src<num>'.
And you are right about the 9 clock inputs, just there're not only 9 inputs but also an extra external clock from S/PDIF transmitter via coaxial cable or optical fiber -- RxCLK. Please check the following list:
0000 if (DPLL Locked) SPDIF_RxClk else extal 0001 if (DPLL Locked) SPDIF_RxClk else spdif_clk 0010 if (DPLL Locked) SPDIF_RxClk else asrc_clk 0011 if (DPLL Locked) SPDIF_RxClk else spdif_extclk 0100 if (DPLL Locked) SPDIF_Rxclk else esai_hckt 0101 extal_clk 0110 spdif_clk 0111 asrc_clk 1000 spdif_extclk 1001 esai_hckt 1010 if (DPLL Locked) SPDIF_RxClk else mlb_clk 1011 if (DPLL Locked) SPDIF_RxClk else mlb_phy_clk 1100 mkb_clk 1101 mlb_phy_clk
When (DPLL Locked) condition matches, the rx clock can ignore the 8 input clocks from clock mux then use the external one from a S/PDIF transmitter.
So for the below part:
+Optional properties:
- rx-clksrc-lock: This is a boolean property. If present, ClkSrc_Sel
bit + of SPDIF_SRPC would be set a clock source that cares DPLL locked condition. +
This again looks like software configuration, not hardware description. Could you elaborate a bit more on meaning of this property?
I think the rx-clksrc-lock property should be included in DT as well, since it's exactly a available clock source for rx. But I guess I just need to figure out a better way or a more elaborated description.
Thank you, Nicolin Chen