8 Jun
2015
8 Jun
'15
5:30 p.m.
On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 03:38:22PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
+#define snd_hdac_ext_bus_ppcap_updateb(dev, reg, mask, val) \
- snd_hdac_ext_bus_ppcap_writeb(dev, reg, \
(snd_hdac_ext_bus_ppcap_readb(dev, reg) & \~(mask)) | (val))It's not necessarily good to wrap all with such macros. For azx_write*(), I kept them as is for reducing the amount of useless code rewrites. But for new codes, I don't think it's always worth...
Actually while updating the patch for ext I was wondering about this too.
So we cna remove these and use snd_hdac_chip_writel/w/b here
As Jeeja pointed we can't use snd_hdac_chip_writel as we need to use a different base. So we cna move this to use plain writel only
Any other ideas?
--
~Vinod