6 Sep
2012
6 Sep
'12
11:56 p.m.
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 12:55:00PM -0700, Taylor Hutt wrote:
Shouldn't the codec be suspended if there are no paths set to remain active across the suspend?
Yes. If you're using an analogue bypass path there's a very recent commit in -next from me which should help, previously we weren't ever really suspending bypass paths at all (even before the changes to keep some paths active) though we might end up doing so by accident. Nobody noticed since essentially nobody uses analogue bypass any more.