Hi Shuah,
On 4 February 2016 at 15:35, Shuah Khan shuahkh@osg.samsung.com wrote:
On 02/04/2016 07:04 AM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
[expanding the CC a little]
Hi Andy, (and Shuah)
On 4 February 2016 at 05:51, Andy Lutomirski luto@kernel.org wrote:
[cc list heavily trimmed]
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 8:03 PM, Shuah Khan shuahkh@osg.samsung.com wrote:
Change dvb frontend to check if tuner is free when device opened in RW mode. Call to enable_source handler either returns with an active pipeline to tuner or error if tuner is busy. Tuner is released when frontend is released calling the disable_source handler.
As an actual subscriber to linux-api, I prefer for the linux-api list to be lowish-volume and mostly limited to API-related things. Is this API related? Do people think that these series should be sent to linux-api?
I think not, and I'd like to stem the flood of mail to the list. There's two things that we could do:
I simply followed the getmaintainers generate3d list. A bit surprised to see linux-api, but didn't want to leave it out.
Yep -- you and many others. That's the problem with automated solutions ;-).
- Shuah, I know we talked about this in the past, and it made some
sense to me at the time for kselftest to use linux-api@, but maybe it's time to create a dedicated list, and move the traffic there? It'd help focus the traffic of linux-api more on its original purpose.
Yes that is a good plan - I will request a new mailing list and send in a patch to Kselftest MAINTIANER's entry.
Thanks, and sorry for the inconvenience. I guess a prominent mail onto linux-api@ advertising the new list, once it has been created, would not go amiss.
Cheers,
Michael