18 Jan
2021
18 Jan
'21
1:31 a.m.
15.01.2021 18:22, Thierry Reding пишет: ...
static int hda_tegra_first_init(struct azx *chip, struct platform_device *pdev) { struct hda_tegra *hda = container_of(chip, struct hda_tegra, chip); @@ -495,7 +441,11 @@ static int hda_tegra_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) return err; }
- err = hda_tegra_init_clk(hda);
- hda->clocks[hda->nclocks++].id = "hda";
- hda->clocks[hda->nclocks++].id = "hda2hdmi";
- hda->clocks[hda->nclocks++].id = "hda2codec_2x";
Originally the code did this in this order: "hda", "hda2codec_2x" and "hda2hdmi". I don't expect the exact order to be very relevant, but was there any particular reason to change it?
The reason was "to make code look nicer". This was a conscious decision since indeed the clocks order shouldn't matter for this driver.