[Sound-open-firmware] [PATCH] platform: add trace code for debug

zhigangw zhigang.wu at linux.intel.com
Thu Jun 21 03:23:20 CEST 2018



On 2018年06月20日 18:22, Liam Girdwood wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-06-20 at 09:32 +0800, zhigangw wrote:
>>> Best to use component ID here. Btw if this is high frequency then it should
>>> also
>>> be made verbose trace.
>>>
>>> Liam
>> I also think about it.
>> Component ID is not convenient for engineer to distinguish the source
>> and sink type quickly during debug.
>> The ID is dynamic, but the type is fixed.
>> Even in future, one pipeline has multiple same components, it will not
>> cause confusion using component type.
>> Not sure my thought is proper. Maybe you have another concern.
> + Rander
>
> The component ID will be available by reading back debugFS and part of trace
> too.
>
> Liam
ok, I will send v2.
Thanks
~zhigang
> _______________________________________________
> Sound-open-firmware mailing list
> Sound-open-firmware at alsa-project.org
> http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/sound-open-firmware



More information about the Sound-open-firmware mailing list