[PATCH] ALSA: hda: Do not unset preset when cleaning up codec

[Cezary Rojewski]

On 2023-01-18 12:38 PM, Cezary Rojewski wrote:
> On 2023-01-17 4:48 PM, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
>> On 1/17/23 09:47, Cezary Rojewski wrote:
>>> Several functions that take part in codec's initialization and removal
>>> are re-used by ASoC codec drivers implementations. Drivers mimic the
>>> behavior of hda_codec_driver_probe/remove() found in
>>> sound/pci/hda/hda_bind.c with their component->probe/remove() instead.
>>>
>>> One of the reasons for that is the expectation of
>>> snd_hda_codec_device_new() to receive a valid struct snd_card pointer
>>> what cannot be fulfilled on ASoC side until a card is attempted to be
>>
>> very hard to follow.
>> Is there a spurious 'what' to be removed?
>> Or is there missing text?
>> Please consider rewording with simpler sentences.
> 
> Thanks for the comments. 'what' is here on purpose as to my ear this 
> sentence sounds reasonable, but I'm not a native English speaker so I 
> might be wrong here.
> 
> The following is being explained by the commit message:
> 
> - functions such as snd_hda_codec_device_new() expect a valid pointer to 
> struct snd_card instance
> - for ASoC hda codec drivers, when hdev_attach/detach() are called, 
> there is no possibility to provide one to HDAudio API as card components 
> are not yet enumerated
> - once component->probe() is invoked and succeeds, component->card will 
> point to a valid sound card
> - hda codec driver is now ready to call snd_hda_codec_device_new()

Let me rephrase the last 2 points: hda codec driver is ready to call 
functions such as snd_hda_codec_device_new() only when its 
component->probe() op gets invoked. Until that happens, field 
component->card is invalid.