[PATCH] ASoC: max98088: add support for reg_4a_cfg_bypass reg

[Mark Brown]

On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 01:09:59PM +0200, Tommaso Merciai wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 11:53:07AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 12:46:42PM +0200, Tommaso Merciai wrote:
> > > On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 11:12:02AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:

> > > > These look like they should be DAPM controls since they're controlling
> > > > audio routing but they're being added as regular controls.

> > > Sorry again. You suggest to create a new structure for these entries,
> > > for example:

> > If that's how they fit into the routing for the device, yes - you'd need
> > to define the bypass mixer as well and set up appropraite routes.

> I added this reg as regular controls because this reg is pretty generic
> as you can see this controll bypass of some output, not all. 
> What do you think about?

That sounds exactly like a DAPM control, please make them DAPM controls.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/attachments/20220512/3d9cbdca/attachment.sig>