[PATCH 5/5] ACPI / scan: Create platform device for CLSA0100

tanureal at opensource.cirrus.com tanureal at opensource.cirrus.com
Mon Jan 17 11:47:32 CET 2022


On 1/15/22 6:59 AM, Takashi Iwai <tiwai at suse.de> wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Jan 2022 19:56:04 +0100,
> Hans de Goede wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 1/14/22 18:51, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 5:19 PM Takashi Iwai <tiwai at suse.de> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 18:07:28 +0100,
> >>> Lucas Tanure wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> The ACPI device with CLSA0100 is a sound card with
> >>>> multiple instances of CS35L41 connected by I2C to
> >>>> the main CPU.
> >>>>
> >>>> We add an ID to the i2c_multi_instantiate_idsi list
> >>>> to enumerate all I2C slaves correctly.
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Lucas Tanure <tanureal at opensource.cirrus.com>
> >>>
> >>> I think it's better to merge this from sound git tree together with
> >>> others in the patch set, presumably for rc1.
> >>>
> >>> It'd be great if ACPI people can take a review and give an ack/nack.
> >>
> >> Hans, what do you think?
> >
> > This patch (5/5) applies on top of:
> >
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/20211210154050.3713-1-sbinding@opensource.cirrus.com/
> >
> > Which still needs some work and which really should be merged
> > through the ACPI tree. IMHO it would be best to simply drop
> > this (5/5) from this series and move it to the v3 of the
> > series which I've linked to above.
> >
> > 1-4 can be merged through the alsa tree independently of 5/5 AFAIK.
> 
> OK, that's fine.
> 
> Lucas, could you submit v3 patches in the suggested way?
Yes, we will do that.
Thanks
> 
> 
> thanks,
> 
> Takashi
> 


More information about the Alsa-devel mailing list