[PATCH v2] ASoC: codecs: add uspport for the TI SRC4392 codec

[Mark Brown]

On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 10:23:23AM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 05:21:23PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:

> > It's probably worth talking to the 0day people about prioritising what
> > they're reporting against, especially given that the reports have
> > evolved into a bit of an eye chart - this was reported against a Hexagon
> > randconfig with an unreleased compiler which is underselling it rather.

> At the same time, I would expect developers and maintainers to focus on
> the warning text first and foremost, not what architecture,
> configuration, or compiler is being used. This issue is very clearly not
> architecture or configuration specific, there is no #ifdef in this

That's the eye chart bit of it - part of the problem with 0day
specificially is that a lot of their reports have become quite hard to
read, they've been putting in something that looks a lot like git
annotate output which makes things very wide which causes wrapping
issues (this one is actually a bit better than most now I go look at it
again since it doesn't have that indentation).  Picking obscure
configurations makes it more likely that people won't get round to
figuring out what the issue being reported is since it seems less urgent
and therefore gets pushed further to the back of the queue.  For
something that's cropping up on a wide range of configurations it'd be
good to priorirtize the more prominent ones to mitigate against this.

> function that changes the nature of the warning. While it is compiler
> specific (because possible uninitialized variable warnings are disabled
> with GCC), it is not dependent on the version (although I guess that
> isn't apparent). I suppose I can just comment on future randconfig
> reports to point out how they will affect allmodconfig and such.

That'd probably help.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/attachments/20220818/96307264/attachment.sig>