[PATCH v2 0/6] ALSA: hda: Unify codec construction

Cezary Rojewski cezary.rojewski at intel.com
Tue Aug 16 12:08:12 CEST 2022


On 2022-08-16 11:59 AM, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Aug 2022 10:15:44 +0200,
> Cezary Rojewski wrote:

...

>>> Cezary Rojewski (6):
>>>     ASoC: Intel: Skylake: Introduce HDA codec init and exit routines
>>>     ASoC: SOF: Intel: Introduce HDA codec init and exit routines
>>>     ASoC: Intel: Drop hdac_ext usage for codec device creation
>>>     ALSA: hda: Always free codec on the device release
>>>     ALSA: hda: Remove codec init and exit routines
>>>     ALSA: hda: Fix page fault in snd_hda_codec_shutdown()
>>
>>
>> I've received a message yesterday that patches: 1/6, 3/6 and 6/6 were
>> not delivered to recipient: alsa-devel at alsa-projet.org. None else is
>> listed there. lore.kernel.org also shows only four letters (3 +
>> cover-letter) rather than seven. Given Mark's Ack on patch 3/6 it
>> makes me believe that indeed just the alsa-devel did not received some
>> of the messages.
>>
>> What should I do in such situation? Is the server admin about to

Meant to say 'able' instead of 'about'.

>> "recover them from the void" or should I resend the entire series as:
>> "[RESEND PATCH v2]" as see how it goes this time?
> 
> I guess the full resubmission would be better.


Should I apply Mark's ACKs for patches 2/6 and 3/6 in the 
about-to-be-resent series?


More information about the Alsa-devel mailing list