[PATCH v1 1/2] kselftest: alsa: Factor out check that values meet constraints

Cezary Rojewski cezary.rojewski at intel.com
Fri Dec 17 15:54:35 CET 2021


On 2021-12-17 3:38 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 02:32:24PM +0100, Cezary Rojewski wrote:
>> On 2021-12-17 2:02 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> 
>>> +	for (i = 0; i < snd_ctl_elem_info_get_count(ctl->info); i++)
>>> +		if (!ctl_value_index_valid(ctl, val, i))
>>> +			valid = false;
> 
>> Correct me I'm wrong, but it seems a 'return false' would suffice. Is the
>> continuation of looping still needed once a single check found above
>> evaluates to true?

Just read my initial message and clearly an 'if' : (. Sorry for the 
confusion.

> It doesn't affect the result of the test but it will cause us to print a
> diagnostic message for each invalid value rather than just the first one
> we see (eg, if both channels in a stereo control have an invalid value)
> which seems like it's more helpful to people working with the output
> than just the first error.

So there is a good reason to do so. And I agree with such approach. 
Thanks for explaining, Mark!


Regards,
Czarek


More information about the Alsa-devel mailing list