[alsa-devel] [PATCH 19/19] ASoC: Intel: bytcr_rt5640: Set card long_name based on quirks
Hans de Goede
hdegoede at redhat.com
Thu May 10 20:01:24 CEST 2018
Hi,
On 10-05-18 19:46, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> On 5/10/18 10:48 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 10-05-18 17:00, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
>>> On 5/10/18 5:27 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> On 08-05-18 20:35, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
>>>>> On 5/8/18 10:36 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>>>>> Many X86 devices using a BYT SoC + RT5640 codec are cheap devices with
>>>>>> generic DMI strings, causing snd_soc_set_dmi_name() to fail to set a
>>>>>> long_name, making it impossible for userspace to have a correct UCM
>>>>>> profile which only uses inputs / outputs which are actually hooked up
>>>>>> on the device.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Our quirks already specify which input the internal mic is connected to
>>>>>> and if a single (mono) speaker is used or if the device has stereo
>>>>>> speakers.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This commit sets a long_name based on the quirks so that userspace can
>>>>>> have UCM profiles doing the right thing based on the long_name.
>>>>>
>>>>> Isn't this going to be complicated to manage for UCM? Just with this patch alone, you'd need 8 UCM files to cover all the combinations. 16 if you add the 'sof-' prefix.
>>>>>
>>>>> seems like UCM should become more 'dynamic' and get quirk information somehow (sysfs?) to enable/disable endpoints rather than rely on name encoding to select the right profile?
>>>>
>>>> I agree that this is not ideal, but this is an improvement from the
>>>> current state where we would need 1 UCM profile per board
>>>> (assuming valid DMI data and thus a proper long-name being set),
>>>> 6 profiles (dmic2 is not used anywhere sofar) is a whole lot easier
>>>> to manage then 1 profile per board. So as said I believe this is
>>>> a step in the right direction.
>>>>
>>>> And looking at the foreseeable future I simply don't see any of us
>>>> having the time to implement an ideal solution for this. I would
>>>> really like for end users to be able to run the latest upstream
>>>> kernel + alsa-lib and have things just work, before this hardware
>>>> becomes obsolete. I know that no-one having time to work on reworking
>>>> UCM to make it more dynamic is not the best of arguments but it
>>>> is something to take into consideration.
>>>>
>>>> Thinking more about this on the alsa-lib / UCM profile side we
>>>> could have something like this:
>>>>
>>>> /usr/share/alsa/ucm/bytcr-rt5640-mono-spk-in1-mic/bytcr-rt5640-mono-spk-in1-mic.conf:
>>>>
>>>> SectionUseCase."HiFi" {
>>>> File "../bytcr-rt5640/Generic.conf"
>>>> File "../bytcr-rt5640/MonoSpeaker.conf"
>>>> File "../bytcr-rt5640/In1Mic.conf"
>>>> Comment "Play HiFi quality Music"
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> SectionDefaults [
>>>> cdev "hw:bytcrrt5640"
>>>> ]
>>>>
>>>> The only problem I can see with that is that the "ConflictingDevice"
>>>> sections for the various inputs / outputs then would refer to not
>>>> present SectionDevice sections. I have not tested this suggestion yet,
>>>> but I'm willing to write an alsa-lib patch to ignore non present
>>>> ConflictingDevice references, to make my suggestion work.
>>>>
>>>> I think doing things this way, thus avoiding the need to copy and
>>>> paste a whole lot of UCM code for the 6 profiles it will not be
>>>> a problem to maintain 6 profiles, as we're really just maintaining
>>>> 6 config snippets such as the above example and only one complete
>>>> profile.
>>>>
>>>> Would the solution I outlined above be acceptable to you?
>>>
>>> The includes and disabling conflicting devices that aren't present make sense. I have another issue though: for SOF integration I already prepared a set of files, which are mostly identical to the regular ones except that the platform-side mixer controls are removed (or different) and the name of the card/device is different (sof- prefix). See on github.
>>
>> Hmm, it might make sense to split the includes in platform and codec includes, so
>> to pick my example again we would get:
>>
>> /usr/share/alsa/ucm/bytcr-rt5640-mono-spk-in1-mic/bytcr-rt5640-mono-spk-in1-mic.conf:
>>
>> SectionUseCase."HiFi" {
>> SectionVerb {
>> EnableSequence [
>> cdev "hw:bytcrrt5640"
>>
>> File "../bytcr-rt5640/EnableSeq.conf" # This contains the platform mixer settings
>> File "../rt5640/EnableSeq.conf"
>> ]
>>
>> DisableSequence [
>> ]
>>
>> Value {
>> PlaybackPCM "hw:bytcrrt5640"
>> CapturePCM "hw:bytcrrt5640"
>> }
>> }
>>
>> File "../rt5640/Headset.conf"
>> File "../rt5640/MonoSpeaker.conf"
>> File "../rt5640/In1Mic.conf"
>> Comment "Play HiFi quality Music"
>> }
>>
>> SectionDefaults [
>> cdev "hw:bytcrrt5640"
>> ]
>>
>> And then for sof you would just need to
>> offer a sof-rt5640/EnableSeq.conf, or
>> maybe even leave it out completely.
>>
>> And we might also be able to merge the platform
>> enable sequences into a generic:
>>
>> bytcr/EnableSeq.conf
>>
>> I think that will at least fly for bytcr-rt5640 and
>> butcr-rt5651, leading us being able to remove more
>> duplicated UCM config.
>>
>> How does this sound?
>
> splitting platform and codec sides is a good idea (and something that was done by removing all platform mixer settings from the HiFi files)
>
> the problem remains that we have all these cdev strings that are hard-codec with a card name. Same when the match happens based on a DMI string, how would I know which of the platform settings to apply without querying what the platform driver is?
Well the DMI string would uniquely identify a certain model device,
when we write the UCM file we should know what the platform + codec
for that device is and we can simply hardcode them, like in
my example above.
But maybe I'm misunderstanding you?
Regards,
Hans
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> sound/soc/intel/boards/bytcr_rt5640.c | 9 +++++++++
>>>>>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/sound/soc/intel/boards/bytcr_rt5640.c b/sound/soc/intel/boards/bytcr_rt5640.c
>>>>>> index cfc520200214..9a1204dcdbc6 100644
>>>>>> --- a/sound/soc/intel/boards/bytcr_rt5640.c
>>>>>> +++ b/sound/soc/intel/boards/bytcr_rt5640.c
>>>>>> @@ -929,6 +929,7 @@ static struct snd_soc_dai_link byt_rt5640_dais[] = {
>>>>>> static char byt_rt5640_codec_name[SND_ACPI_I2C_ID_LEN];
>>>>>> static char byt_rt5640_codec_aif_name[12]; /* = "rt5640-aif[1|2]" */
>>>>>> static char byt_rt5640_cpu_dai_name[10]; /* = "ssp[0|2]-port" */
>>>>>> +static char byt_rt5640_long_name[40]; /* = "bytcr-rt5640-*-spk-*-mic" */
>>>>>> static int byt_rt5640_suspend(struct snd_soc_card *card)
>>>>>> {
>>>>>> @@ -1000,6 +1001,7 @@ struct acpi_chan_package { /* ACPICA seems to require 64 bit integers */
>>>>>> static int snd_byt_rt5640_mc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>>>> {
>>>>>> + const char * const map_name[] = { "dmic1", "dmic2", "in1", "in3" };
>>>>>> const struct dmi_system_id *dmi_id;
>>>>>> struct byt_rt5640_private *priv;
>>>>>> struct snd_soc_acpi_mach *mach;
>>>>>> @@ -1163,6 +1165,13 @@ static int snd_byt_rt5640_mc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>>>> }
>>>>>> }
>>>>>> + snprintf(byt_rt5640_long_name, sizeof(byt_rt5640_long_name),
>>>>>> + "bytcr-rt5640-%s-spk-%s-mic",
>>>>>> + (byt_rt5640_quirk & BYT_RT5640_MONO_SPEAKER) ?
>>>>>> + "mono" : "stereo",
>>>>>> + map_name[BYT_RT5640_MAP(byt_rt5640_quirk)]);
>>>>>> + byt_rt5640_card.long_name = byt_rt5640_long_name;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> ret_val = devm_snd_soc_register_card(&pdev->dev, &byt_rt5640_card);
>>>>>> if (ret_val) {
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>
More information about the Alsa-devel
mailing list