[alsa-devel] [PATCH] ASoC: add missing compile rule for max98371

Takashi Iwai tiwai at suse.de
Fri Sep 1 10:14:16 CEST 2017


On Fri, 01 Sep 2017 09:44:47 +0200,
Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
> 
> 
> Hi Takashi
> 
> > > diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/Makefile b/sound/soc/codecs/Makefile
> > > index 12dc2f7..d93318e 100644
> > > --- a/sound/soc/codecs/Makefile
> > > +++ b/sound/soc/codecs/Makefile
> > > @@ -322,6 +322,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_SND_SOC_MAX98088)	+= snd-soc-max98088.o
> > >  obj-$(CONFIG_SND_SOC_MAX98090)	+= snd-soc-max98090.o
> > >  obj-$(CONFIG_SND_SOC_MAX98095)	+= snd-soc-max98095.o
> > >  obj-$(CONFIG_SND_SOC_MAX98357A)	+= snd-soc-max98357a.o
> > > +obj-$(CONFIG_SND_SOC_MAX98371)	+= snd-soc-max98371.o
> > >  obj-$(CONFIG_SND_SOC_MAX9867)	+= snd-soc-max9867.o
> > >  obj-$(CONFIG_SND_SOC_MAX98925)	+= snd-soc-max98925.o
> > >  obj-$(CONFIG_SND_SOC_MAX98926)	+= snd-soc-max98926.o
> > 
> > This part doesn't match with the patch description.
> > You're trying to revive the dead driver build.
> > Ditto for sirf-audio-codec, too.
> 
> Oops ?
> But, there is max98371.c on my tree? sirf too
> I'm using different branch ?

It's been there but never built.  At least, your patch indicates
that.


Takashi


More information about the Alsa-devel mailing list