[alsa-devel] [PATCH] pcm: fix wrong document references to PCM APIs which perform direct memory access with frame copying

[Takashi Sakamoto]

On Dec 13 2016 08:25, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> Actually I took the second one (the removal of unused variables), as
> it's a good cleanup.
>
> But the first one, the change of the type, is in a gray zone, and I'd
> like to leave such a thing.  Changing the loop variable like i to
> unsigned int is rather confusing, and it may be a source of bugs if
> anyone reuses i for another loop.  The warning is merely an annoyance,
> and IMO, we just should suppress the compile warning like the kernel
> does.
>
> The third patch, the removal of the unused table, is postponed because
> I don't know whether it's intentional or overlook unless confirmation
> from Intel people.

OK. I wait for their ack about these two patches. Thanks for your reviewing!

>>> [alsa-devel] [PATCH][alsa-lib] topology: fix sign-compare warning
>>> introduced to set_link_hw_config() and tplg_add_link_object()
>>> http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/2016-November/115245.html
>>>
>>> [alsa-devel] [PATCH][alsa-lib] topology: fix unused-variable warnings
>>> introduced to build_link()
>>> http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/2016-November/115246.html
>>>
>>> [alsa-devel] [PATCH][alsa-lib] topology: fix unused-const-variable warning
>>> http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/2016-November/115247.html


Gute Nacht.

Takashi Sakamoto