[alsa-devel] [PATCH 3/3] ASoC: rt5645: add device tree support

[Mark Brown]

On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 08:30:52AM -0500, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:

> Agree, but there wasn't a clear message provided to the readers of this
> mailing list. A 'should' is a recommendation that provides no real incentive
> to move to the new gpiod framework. The message would be clearer if
> maintainers stated that new contributions using of_get_named_gpio() will no
> longer be merged in the mainline (maybe after a specific milestone). That
> would set the direction for everyone.

That's what's been happening...
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/attachments/20150508/05581f6c/attachment.sig>