[alsa-devel] [RFC PATCH 3/4] ALSA: core: add report of max dma burst

[Raymond Yau]

>
>
> >>> +   unsigned int max_dma_burst;     /* R: max in-flight bytes,
indicates buffering before hw_ptr */
>
> I'm not sure if we should name fields like dma in the abstract ioctl
> layer. The words in the comment seems more appropriate or just remove
> dma and keep only max_burst.

Why not using hwptr_granularity if the usage is about the hw_ptr update
interval ?

max_dma_brust is confusing for firewire and usb audio