[alsa-devel] About ALSA SoC cpu/codec asymmetry
lars at metafoo.de
Mon Mar 10 08:14:22 CET 2014
On 03/10/2014 08:03 AM, Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
> Hi Lars
>> There is already a cpu_name field for the DAI link struct and it is ignored
>> when it is NULL. See
>> I have a patch that makes using cpu_name mandatory for new component
>> drivers. And then we can slowly start to convert old platforms.
> Nice !
> Basically, my worry is cpu/codec "asymmetry" data structure.
> (Maybe it came from "historical" reason?)
> I would like to have new "struct snd_soc_cpu" and "snd_soc_register_cpu()"
> instead of current "component" if possible.
> It is understandable.
The patchset I'm working goes the other direction. The idea is to eventually
remove snd_soc_codec and only have snd_soc_component. With modern SoCs the
CPU side isn't just a dumb DAI anymore, but you often have signal routing
and mixing capabilities, sample rate converters, sometimes even a full DSP.
And then there are also those SoCs which have a DAC and/or ADC directly
built-in. This makes them complexity wise similar to the CODEC side and
having things like DAPM and our set of standard predefined kcontrols makes
it easier to manage them.
More information about the Alsa-devel