[alsa-devel] [PATCH v4] ALSA: Add SoC on-chip internal memory support for DMA buffer allocation

Mark Brown broonie at kernel.org
Thu Oct 17 11:38:34 CEST 2013

On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 09:54:32AM +0800, Nicolin Chen wrote:

> Do I still need to change the name to SRAM? I think both name make sense to me.
> I use IRAM just because using different name for phandle and macro/functions
> might confuse people when reviewing the patch. But it looks like IRAM is still
> not the perfect choice.

No, IRAM is fine if that is actually used these days.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/attachments/20131017/b96e9797/attachment.sig>

More information about the Alsa-devel mailing list