[alsa-devel] [PATCH 4/4] ALSA: oxygen: Updating jack implementation according new ALSA Jacks

Felipe Ferreri Tonello eu at felipetonello.com
Thu Aug 1 05:51:43 CEST 2013

Hi Takashi,

On 07/29/2013 05:10 AM, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> At Fri, 26 Jul 2013 12:02:51 -0700,
> Felipe Tonello wrote:
>> Hi Mark,
>> On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Mark Brown <broonie at kernel.org> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 11:25:33AM -0700, Felipe F. Tonello wrote:
>>>> From: "Felipe F. Tonello" <eu at felipetonello.com>
>>>> ALSA standard jacks already are implemented using ALSA KControl.
>>>> So there is no need implement that itself or to use snd_jack
>>>> for input events only.
>>> Similar changlog comment as on the ASoC patch and...
>> Ok.
>>>>        snd_jack_new(chip->card, "Headphone",
>>>> -                  SND_JACK_HEADPHONE, &data->hp_jack);
>>>> +                  SND_JACK_HEADPHONE, 0, &data->hp_jack);
>>>>        xonar_ds_handle_hp_jack(chip);
>>> ...this really ought to be done as part of the commit that adds the
>>> parameter since it breaks the build until this patch is applied.
>> But that's why is a patch series. But as you say, are you suggesting
>> me to propose this changes in one patch only?
> The basic rule of the patch series is:
> - they are split in a logical manner
> - each commit must not break the build
> The second rule is important especially for bisection and
> backporting.  You could have done in a different way (e.g. adding a
> new function like snd_jack_new_with_index() instead of changing
> snd_jack_new() itself).  Which way is better, depends on the
> implementation details.

In this case I think this will not solve the issue. Because the my 
propose is to make the control creation standard for jacks.

Felipe Tonello

More information about the Alsa-devel mailing list