[alsa-devel] [PATCH] ASoC: core: Configure pin muxing via pinctrl when registering a DAI
swarren at wwwdotorg.org
Tue Sep 25 19:00:33 CEST 2012
On 09/25/2012 05:24 AM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> On 09/25/2012 02:11 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 04:37:23PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
>>> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Mark Brown
>>>> Well, the problem here is that people keep wanting to add one shot
>>>> pinctrl calls in drivers which clearly suggests that it ought to be
>>>> factored out.
>>> OK so can we find some suitable middle ground here?
>>> Something like drivers could add some boolean flag to
>>> "opt-in" for the core to handle this or so?
>> Well, I don't know if we need to - it sounds like the platforms that are
>> running around adding these pinctrl calls to all the drivers are doing
>> it wrong and should be fixed.
> In the scope of audio...
> I guess it is one thing to use the pinctrl framework to configure the mux for
> the pins (which was the original idea of the patch). This should be taken care
> in some centralized place, I agree.
> But the pinctrl could be used to change the mux runtime. For example in OMAP
> for most of the audio related pins we need to select MODE0 mux configuration
> in order to route the signal to the pin. However the same pin can be
> configured to SAFE_MODE which disconnects the pin from outside.
> During audio activity we obviously need to configure these pins to MODE0 but
> when there is not activity we could set them to SAFE_MODE which could result
> some power savings (preventing leakage, etc).
> For this to work it would be ideal to use the pm_runtime as a centralized
> place to handle clocks, pinctrl, etc...
> But again, what to do with the cases when this is not needed (the pinctrl part
> for the devices)?
Maybe it can be opt-in, like pm_runtime support at all, e.g. a driver
that supports it can:
where if pinctrl_state_name==NULL, it uses PINCTRL_STATE_IDLE. (Making
this a parameter would allow for devices that use a more complex set of
states where the default state names may not be appropriate). Perhaps we
could phase that in if/when needed, by introducing
pm_runtime_enable_pinctrl(dev) first, then adding
pm_runtime_enable_pinctrl_state(dev, state) later?
Of course, I suppose that only really addresses the case where the
IP/driver itself knows if/when to enable this feature - if an I2S IP
block is used in 10 different SoCs, and runtime pinctrl is only useful
on 5 of them, how does it know when to make that call?
More information about the Alsa-devel