[alsa-devel] [PATCH] ASoC: dapm: Allow DAPM registers to be unsigned int

[Mark Brown]

On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 09:52:20AM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Mark Brown

> > -       short reg;                                              /* negative reg = no direct dapm */
> > +       unsigned int reg;                       /* negative reg = no direct dapm */

> Maybe you should update the comment now that this is unsigned int.

Bah, humbug - no, it needs to be signed int and we don't support the
full 32 bits.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/attachments/20120308/1f7c9d9d/attachment-0001.sig