[alsa-devel] [PATCH v2 REBASE] ASoC: fsl_ssi: convert to use devm_clk_get

Mark Brown broonie at opensource.wolfsonmicro.com
Tue Jun 5 12:20:40 CEST 2012

On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 11:15:59AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 11:14:13AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:

> > That'd work too, of course (providing everyone has been implementing
> > clk_put()).  Though getting everyone on the same page with the clock API
> > seems much more worthwhile if we can do it.

> Why wouldn't clk_put() be implemented?  Drivers call it just like clk_get().

Lazy people who can't be bothered, especially on platforms that do
things like just return a pointer to a statically allocated clock or
never really expect their drivers to be unloaded.  Hopefully everyone
filled in the blank but I've just got a general pessimism about relying
on things like that.

> The devm*() stuff should just be a layer on top of clk_get()/clk_put() and
> nothing more.

It is, yes.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/attachments/20120605/3e744aea/attachment-0001.sig 

More information about the Alsa-devel mailing list