[alsa-devel] [PATCH 0/6] ASoC: a few cleanups on sound/soc/fsl
timur at freescale.com
Sat Feb 25 00:14:12 CET 2012
Shawn Guo wrote:
>> > That doesn't seem to be related to my point? I'm asking you to not
>> > reply to an old version of your patch series in order to post a new
>> > version of it, just post the new version.
> This is the first version of this series.
I think there's a communication breakdown. Shawn, take a look at this:
Search for "[alsa-devel] [PATCH 0/6] ASoC: a few cleanups on sound/soc/fsl".
You'll see that this email is indented, because it was posted to the
mailing list AS A REPLY to "[alsa-devel] [PATCH 1/4] ASoC: imx: let
SND_MXC_SOC_FIQ select FIQ". That's because it has this line in the
In-Reply-To: <1329979644-31046-1-git-send-email-shawn.guo at linaro.org>
This is what Mark is talking about. He wants new patch sets to be posted
NOT as replies to other patch sets.
Linux kernel developer at Freescale
More information about the Alsa-devel