[alsa-devel] [RFC PATCH] HDA: Generic input jack handling
tiwai at suse.de
Fri Oct 7 15:03:52 CEST 2011
At Fri, 07 Oct 2011 14:46:07 +0200,
David Henningsson wrote:
> On 10/07/2011 02:08 PM, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > At Fri, 07 Oct 2011 13:49:46 +0200,
> > David Henningsson wrote:
> >> So, this is what I had in mind for 3.2. Assuming positive feedback from
> >> Takashi I'll go ahead and make a real patch out of this, and to clean up
> >> the Realtek implementation, as well as probably add this method for more
> >> codecs.
> >> Thoughts:
> >> 1) The unsol event tags vary wildly between different vendors. How about
> >> standardising that as well?
> > Generalization is good. But tags aren't always constant. It'd be
> > better to assign each tag dynamically like in patch_sigmatel.c.
> > The reason is that you'd need to know the pin NID from the unsol
> > event, so the tag has to be unique even for the same purpose. E.g. if
> > a machine has two headphones, both are the same type but they should
> > issue unsol events with different tags.
> One would think that this is an area where it shouldn't differ between
> vendors (after all, they need to do the same things, so this is just
> different implementations), but we can clean that up later, and when
> that is done we could consider standardising on having the nid as the
> unsol tag value.
> Anyway, as the patch below stands, sigmatel would call the function with
> unsol_tags->unsol_tag = 0, and then enable the jack itself.
> Did you think the patch looked good otherwise?
Reporting per jack type isn't necessarily correct, e.g. when multiple
pins for the same type are present. In that case, only the changed
pin should be reported. So, in patch_realtek.c, the tag should be
also individual for each pin like in patch_sigmatel.c.
Currently it's using constants because of the model quirks. Once when
these are removed, we can move to the dynamic allocation.
More information about the Alsa-devel