[alsa-devel] [RFC][PATCH] ASoC: Avoid writing to WM8971_RESET in wm8971_resume

[Mark Brown]

On Tue, Oct 04, 2011 at 07:44:22AM +0800, Axel Lin wrote:

> While reading the code, I don't understand why we need to do (in wm8971_resume):
> 
> for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(wm8971_reg); i++) {
>         if (i + 1 == WM8971_RESET)
>                 continue;
> 
> My understanding is that we want to avoid writing to WM8971_RESET on resume.

Yeah, this looks like a leftover from some older code which omitted
register zero from the cache for some small memory savings.  Now things
are using the standard cache code rather than custom cache code this
is buggy.

Applied, thanks.