[alsa-devel] [PATCH 0/3] make the sgtl5000-codec work

Liam Girdwood lrg at ti.com
Tue Jul 19 12:09:44 CEST 2011

On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 11:04 +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> Hi,
> >     pls check http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.alsa.devel/83781
> > 
> >     I think Mark is right, sgtl5000 already declared its register_step is 2, soc_cache.c
> >     should generate a dense cache layout instead of padding it by driver.
> Thanks for the pointer. I can follow Mark's reasoning. In fact, I was
> wondering why ASoC does not consider the step, but I assumed it was
> intentional. With my holidays coming along, nothing I am going to
> tackle in the next time, though ;)
> >     But after check soc_cache.c, ASoC mix up index and register address to index cache,
> >     and many places need to modify to correct it, so I think we should re-consider
> >     if register_step != 1 is not a common case.
> I think it should be properly fixed in ASoC. It should be carefully
> done, but otherwise not be a major task IMO. Note that sgtl5000 will
> need adaptions nonetheless. Which brings me back to the question: In
> what setup did the driver work for you? Did you have regulators on that
> board? I am still trying to understand the side-effects of what I am
> seeing...
> Mark: Will you pick up patches 1 and 2 nonetheless?

Please CC me on all ASoC patches. 1 and 2 look OK.

Acked-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg at ti.com>



More information about the Alsa-devel mailing list