[alsa-devel] additional problem

Takashi Iwai tiwai at suse.de
Mon Jul 11 17:12:29 CEST 2011


At Mon, 11 Jul 2011 11:05:11 -0400,
David Henderson wrote:
> 
> On 07/11/2011 10:43 AM, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > At Mon, 11 Jul 2011 10:26:05 -0400,
> > David Henderson wrote:
> >> On 07/01/2011 02:41 AM, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> >>> At Thu, 30 Jun 2011 08:15:41 -0400,
> >>> David Henderson wrote:
> >>>> On 06/29/2011 09:57 AM, David Henderson wrote:
> >>>>> Hi gang!  I've successfully been able to compile the alsa-utils
> >>>>> package with the
> >>>>> "--with-alsa-inc-prefix=/opt/staging/alsa/var/share/include
> >>>>> --with-alsa-prefix=/opt/staging/alsa/lib", but the problem I'm having
> >>>>> now is that the compiled binaries are looking for those directories
> >>>>> during run-time and not just compile-time.  Does anyone have any
> >>>>> thoughts on using those directories for package creation, but that the
> >>>>> software doesn't use the '/opt/staging/alsa' prefix during run-time?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>> Dave
> >>>> bump for help
> >>> It works usually as is.  Check once via ldd whether the binary is
> >>> really linked with that fixed path.  You may hit a problem when using
> >>> libtool with *.la files, for example.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Takashi
> >> Thanks for the continued help Takashi.  I've performed the requested
> >> steps, but all referenced libs are correct (e.g. /lib/... and not
> >> /opt/staging/alsa/lib/...).  Any other thoughts?
> > Check ldd output of the binary.  If it contains the /opt/ path, it
> > means that the path is set statically into the binary.  The old
> > libtool had a related problem, IIRC.
> >
> > Other than that, rather ask your distro.  It's really distro-specific.
> >
> >
> > Takashi
> 
> Hey Takashi, I performed the requested steps, but the output is still 
> correct (e.g. /lib/... and not /opt/staging/alsa/lib/...). 

So, what shows ldd at all?  Too little information.


Takashi


More information about the Alsa-devel mailing list