[alsa-devel] UCM questions
superquad.vortex2 at gmail.com
Sat Jan 22 06:22:00 CET 2011
2011/1/22 Liam Girdwood <lrg at slimlogic.co.uk>
> On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 14:53 -0600, pl bossart wrote:
> > >> I am fine with a system-specific configuration file for each use case,
> > >> but if I have to change the defines in alsa-lib it's a bit of a pain.
> > >> It'll imply branches and specific packages just for a stupid include
> > >> file.
> > >
> > > If the define isn't there you should just be able to use a string - no
> > > need to update the header file unless the thing being added is
> > > sufficiently general that it seems like a good idea.
> > I think I am missing something here.
> > First I believe there's only one application (PulseAudio or resource
> > management of some sort) that will talk to UCM. Player applications
> > shouldn't know anything about UCM, right? You would end-up making
> > conflicting decisions.
> Yes, it's intended only Pulseaudio (or similar) will directly control
> the use case.
Do you mean that I cannot use my desktop to act as a karaoke by playing
music to default device and singing to the mic with "Mic Playback Volume" of
HDA codec until pulseaudio or Sound preference implement "Mic Playback
More information about the Alsa-devel