[alsa-devel] ASoC updates for 2.6.37

[Dimitris Papastamos]

On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 10:30 +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> Yeah, I do understand the initial intention, but size_t for such a
> case (just for an index of a small fixed size array) is obviously too
> much.  If it must be size_t, it shouldn't be a variable name like "i"
> but a more specific name.

I see your point. Makes sense.

Cheers,
Dimitrios