[alsa-devel] [patch v2] ALSA: rawmidi: fix the get next midi device ioctl

Takashi Iwai tiwai at suse.de
Thu Sep 9 08:57:26 CEST 2010


At Wed, 8 Sep 2010 23:29:14 +0200 (CEST),
Jaroslav Kysela wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 8 Sep 2010, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> 
> > At Wed, 8 Sep 2010 21:36:41 +0200,
> > Dan Carpenter wrote:
> >>
> >> If we pass in a device which is higher than SNDRV_RAWMIDI_DEVICES then
> >> this function just returns device + 1 which isn't helpful.  I've
> >> modified it to return -EINVAL instead.
> >>
> >> Also Smatch complains because the "device + 1" could be an integer
> >> overflow.  It's harmless, but we may as well silence the warning.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <error27 at gmail.com>
> >> ---
> >> V2:  In the first version I made negative values return -EINVAL
> >>
> >> diff --git a/sound/core/rawmidi.c b/sound/core/rawmidi.c
> >> index eb68326..1633bac 100644
> >> --- a/sound/core/rawmidi.c
> >> +++ b/sound/core/rawmidi.c
> >> @@ -829,6 +829,8 @@ static int snd_rawmidi_control_ioctl(struct snd_card *card,
> >>
> >>  		if (get_user(device, (int __user *)argp))
> >>  			return -EFAULT;
> >> +		if (device > SNDRV_RAWMIDI_DEVICES)
> >> +			return -EINVAL;
> >
> > This should be "device >= SNDRV_RAWMIDI_DEVICES".
> 
> Also note that this check changes a bit semantics. All other NEXT_DEVICE 
> ioctls returns -1 if the value is beyond the last device (meaning no more 
> devices were found). So the
> 
>                 if (device == SNDRV_RAWMIDI_DEVICES)
>                          device = -1;
> 
> check should be
> 
>                 if (device >= SNDRV_RAWMIDI_DEVICES)
>                          device = -1;
> 
> ... resulting in one line patch.

But this doesn't work when you pass device = INT_MAX :)


Takashi


More information about the Alsa-devel mailing list