[alsa-devel] [RFC] ASoC: multi-component: Add optional kcontrol prefix name for a DAI link

[Mark Brown]

On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 02:17:29PM +0300, Jarkko Nikula wrote:

> I don't see it are there any problems. For me it looks the routes in
> WM9090 are unique and registered to own codec instance so there should
> not be route prefixing needed.

Meh, right.  DAPM isn't coping with things that cross CODECs really.
This will need to be looked at.

> How these amplifier drivers are actually meant to be probed? Currently
> struct snd_soc_codec_driver->probe is called only from
> soc_probe_dai_link.

We need to set up a list of anciliary devices which are registered
without DAIs for this.