[alsa-devel] Since kernel-2.6.32 alsactl thinks my sound card is "Unknown"
pacho at condmat1.ciencias.uniovi.es
Thu Sep 2 11:26:14 CEST 2010
El jue, 02-09-2010 a las 10:29 +0200, Takashi Iwai escribió:
> Rejected by SPF lookup: (recv=llar.net.uniovi.es,
> send-ip=184.108.40.206) Could not find a valid SPF record
> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.6 (Almost Unreal) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.9
> (=?UTF-8?B?R29qxY0=?=) APEL/10.7 Emacs/23.1 (x86_64-suse-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0
> References: <1283357723.8159.4.camel at localhost.localdomain>
> At Wed, 01 Sep 2010 18:15:23 +0200,
> Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > This is an old problem I am suffering since kernel-2.6.32 and that is
> > still unresolved even with 2.6.35 and alsa-utils-1.0.23:
> > http://www.spinics.net/lists/alsa-devel/msg31422.html
> > If you follow the thread, it got stalled in:
> > http://www.spinics.net/lists/alsa-devel/msg31433.html
> > In summary, I get the following:
> > # alsactl -f /etc/asound.state restore /dev/snd/controlC0
> > Unknown hardware: "VIA8237" "Realtek ALC658D" "AC97a:414c4781" "0x147b"
> > "0x1415"
> > Hardware is initialized using a guess method
> > # echo $?
> > 99
> This is no error. It means that alsactl has no special workaround
> for your hardware. The return code of alsactl looks strange.
> I thought Jaroslav has already fixed it, though...
Well, Jaroslav fixed it to use "99" instead of "157":
And, about the message, could it be reworded for preventing to make
users think their hardware is "Unknown"? Maybe it could simply show "No
workaround needed for: ..." instead of "Unknown hardware"
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/attachments/20100902/3a853916/attachment-0001.sig
More information about the Alsa-devel